Real estate Investment Comparison
Wondering whether CrowdStreet or Landa is a better investment? We put them both to the test to help you compare and decide where to invest your money.
Good option for experienced high net-worth investors, but variable fee structure and high minimums don't work for everyday investors.
Makes it easy to invest in real estate with a well designed platform and low entry costs
Detailed business model and financial support documents, along with profiles on the project principals
They've been around since 2014 and has acquired billions worth of real estate
Most offerings require a $25k commitment, preventing diversification for all but the wealthiest investors
Expected investment time window is at least 5 years
CrowdStreet reports their past performance before taking fees into account, making it hard to compare to other options on the market
Each offering has a different structure and fee schedule, making them hard to compare for all but the most experienced investors.
Landa offers a great customer experience, liquidity, and decent returns, but has a worrisome lack of return projections and historical performance data.
Landa's mobile app is easy, intuitive, and delightful.
Investors can get started from just $5.
Landa's secondary marketplace is one of the only in the space, making real liquidity a possibility.
It's very difficult to fully understand what you're buying before you buy into a Landa property, and impossible to understand how Landa properties have performed in aggregate.
Most Landa properties are located in a single U.S. state, making investors vulnerable to market swings.
Landa buys properties outright before selling fractions back to their investors. Investors therefore carry the cost of financing the property.
You'll have to make trades on Landa's secondary market while you're at work .